Listen Live!
join BAW
forgot password
LIFE
WORK
PLAY


blAck americaweb.com

Prime v. Subprime Borrowers

Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2005
By: Michelle Singletary

Those of us who live in the high tower of credit worthiness can't imagine not negotiating for the best mortgage loans. We pay a penalty for prepaying a loan? Please. Not likely to happen for a prime-time borrower. There are two lending worlds out there -- the prime market (people who can get loans at the best rates) and the subprime market (people who are offered loans with higher interest rates than prime or "choice'' customers).
    
True, the subprime lending market has allowed many credit-challenged people and those without a credit history to buy homes. But within the subprime industry are players who prey on these riskier borrowers. They intentionally burden their customers with loan terms that make it difficult for them to ever join the prime market.
    
For example, two new studies show that subprime customers often get loans with prepayment penalties, which make refinancing a very costly endeavor. Prepayment penalties increase the risk of mortgage foreclosure in subprime home loans, even after controlling for the borrower's credit score, loan terms and varying economic conditions, according to a new report by the Center for Community Capitalism at the University of North Carolina.
    
Another report by the Center for Responsible Lending, a North Carolina-based nonprofit research firm and consumer activist group, indicates that people with subprime home loans who live in minority neighborhoods face 35 percent greater odds of being saddled with prepayment penalties than borrowers living in predominantly white neighborhoods.
    
A prepayment penalty is a fee charged by a lender when a borrower pays off a mortgage loan before the due date, often to refinance to a more affordable loan. For example, a $150,000 subprime mortgage at 10 percent interest could result in a $6,000 fee for prepaying the loan, according to Center for Responsible Lending.
    
These penalties can effectively prevent a family from refinancing -- something that some prime borrowers seemingly do as often as they change the oil in their cars.
    
"Taken together, the research shows (prepayment penalties) are costly, they are applied unfairly, and -- given the risk of foreclosure -- they are dangerous,'' said Keith Ernst, senior policy counsel for the Center for Responsible Lending, during a teleconference.
    
In a typical situation, Ernst said a subprime borrower might get into some financial trouble -- a lost job, broken-down car or something else that makes him or her run up a credit card or cards. To get some relief, the homeowner might try to refinance to consolidate his debt.
    
"For borrowers with a prepayment penalty, this can be impossible,'' Ernst said. "If you owe $135,000 and call up for a payoff quote, they are going to tell you $140,000 because that figure includes the prepayment penalty. Once someone hits this roadblock, foreclosure and/or bankruptcy is likely not far off.''
    
In the example Ernst lays out, having to pay the extra $5,000 in a prepayment penalty could eat up much of the homeowner's available equity. Consider these findings from the recent research, Ernst said:
    
-- Prepayment penalties go disproportionately to borrowers who live in rural areas and in communities with higher concentrations of minority residents.
-- Borrowers with prepayment penalties are 16 percent to 20 percent more likely to see their subprime loans fail.
-- Despite having a prepayment penalty clause in their loans, 37 percent of all borrowers with prepayment penalties prepaid their loans, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars in home equity-based wealth. This can worsen an already wide wealth gap for African-American and Latino families, whose homeownership rates are significantly lower than the average white household.
    
But Mitchell Feinstein, chairman of the National Home Equity Mortgage Association, disputes the findings of the two studies. (By the way, the Center for Community Capitalism received financial support from the Center for Responsible Lending.)
    
Feinstein said in an interview that there is a positive benefit to prepayment penalties because the option can lower interest rates for borrowers.  Not so, according to Michael Stegman, director of the Center for Community Capitalism. Stegman said that, based on the center's research, prepayment penalties do not deliver an offsetting benefit in the form of reduced interest rates. So why should we all care what happens to subprime consumers?
    
If you're an investor, you should be concerned because the higher risk of foreclosures associated with prepayment penalties means greater investment losses, Stegman points out.
    
"Policy-makers should be concerned because predatory lending is draining homeowner equity and increasing foreclosures and home losses, especially in minority communities, just at the time that national housing policy is attempting to close the minority homeownership gap,'' he said.
    
Homeownership has a stabilizing effect on neighborhoods, and that benefits us all. So it is in all of our interests to discourage practices that may cause our neighbors to lose their homes. 
     
Listen to Michelle Singletary discuss personal finance every Tuesday on NPR's “Day to Day.'' To hear her reports online go to www.npr.org. Readers can write to her c/o The Washington Post, 1150 15th St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071. Her e-mail address is singletarym@washpost.com. Comments and questions are welcome, but due to the volume of mail, personal responses are not always possible. Please also note comments or questions may be used in a future column, with the writer's name, unless a specific request to do otherwise is indicated.
    
(c) 2005, Washington Post Writers Group



More Headlines

THE COLOR OF MONEY COLUMN: Office of Thrift Supervision

An increase in consumer complaints over the cancellation or reduction of home equity lines of credit has prompted one federal banking regulator to remind financial institutions about the laws governing this type of loan.

THE COLOR OF MONEY COLUMN: Major Gripes About the IRS

Nina E. Olson, the official appointed to speak out on behalf of U.S. taxpayers, has a few major gripes about the Internal Revenue Service. Among them, she believes the agency needs to better protect ...

THE COLOR OF MONEY COLUMN: Ladies, more of us need to stop fearing all things financial

In a poll by the National Women's Law Center, women respondents were more likely than the men to feel that they are falling behind economically. They worry more about their financial future.

Back to School: Shaky Economy Hits Kids

This year, it could cost nearly twice as much to fuel the yellow buses that rumble to school each morning.

Back to School: More Kids Walk as Fuel Costs Rise

Faced with soaring diesel fuel costs, school districts are forcing students to use the old-fashioned way to get to class: on their own two feet.

THE COLOR OF MONEY COLUMN: Q&A Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008

Part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 authorizes up to a $7,500 tax credit for qualified first-time homebuyers. Based on the questions I'm getting from readers, many people are ...

Getting Smart About Preparing for College

It doesn't take a degree to recognize the importance of going to college. One study found that nine of 10 students expected to participate in postsecondary education. Yet despite these high aspirations, low-income ...

Home Saving Tips

The typical American family spends more than $1,500 a year on home utility bills. Unfortunately, a lot of that energy is wasted. By making simple changes, homeowners can often cut as much as 30% ...



Copyright © 2001-2005 BlackAmericaWeb.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Advertise | Help | Privacy Policy | Search | Terms of Use | Unsubscribe