Thomas to Other Supreme Court Justices: Hush
Date: Monday, October 26, 2009, 5:10 am
By: Jay Reeves, Associated Press
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas hasn't asked a lawyer a question during arguments in nearly four years. (AP)
TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) — Clarence Thomas, the justice long known as the silent member of the Supreme Court, criticized his colleagues Friday for badgering attorneys rather than letting them speak during oral arguments.
Thomas — who hasn't asked a lawyer a question during arguments in nearly four years — said he and the other eight justices virtually always know where they stand on a case by reading legal briefs before oral arguments.
"So why do you beat up on people if you already know? I don't know, because I don't beat up on 'em. I refuse to participate. I don't like it, so I don't do it," Thomas said during an appearance before law students at the University of Alabama.
Thomas didn't name names, but fellow conservative Justice Antonin Scalia is generally considered the court's most aggressive questioner during oral arguments. President Barack Obama's lone nominee so far, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, isn't afraid to ask questions either.
Thomas scoffed at the idea that the justices try to use questions to influence the opinions of fellow members of the court.
"All nine of us are in the same building," he said. "If we want to sway each other we know where we are. We don't need oral arguments to do that. It doesn't make any sense to me."
Thomas spoke briefly to the students before answering questions during a nearly 1 and ½ session, ranging over issues including the confirmation process and the court's makeup.
A conservative nominated by then-President George H.W. Bush, Thomas was sworn in only after a bruising confirmation fight that included sexual harassment allegations he always has denied.
He compared Senate confirmation to selecting the referees for a college football game in hopes of getting favorable calls for one team or the other.
"That's all based on a particular outcome you want. That is the antithesis of judging. You're corrupting your process," he said. "I think the confirmation process is both unnecessary, it's uninformed with respect to what the court actually does and it's very dangerous."
A native of Georgia and the only current justice from the South, Thomas said the court is too dominated by Ivy League lawyers and lacks regional diversity. People constantly worry about racial, gender and ethnic diversity, he said, and home states matter, too.
"My goal is to have a court that is fair, and I think it's fair when we are fair in selecting people from all parts of the country, from all walks of life," Thomas said.
Thomas graduated from the Yale University law school. In all, eight of the nine current justices graduated from Ivy League schools.
Please Login or Register to Rate this article
Since when is asking a question beating up on anyone? Isn't it better to ask for clarification on a subject than to****ume to know everything because of what you read? Completing Yale law did not automatically qualify Clarence Thomas for the supreme court. I think Daddy Bush appointed him because he knew that good ole Clarence WOULD NOT ask questions or DARE to shake things up.
by
Greenp628
October 29, 2009, 11:14 am
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IWhat else would a person expect from a man like this. Total disgrace to his race, that is my definition of Clarence Thomas.
by
Reena
October 26, 2009, 2:50 pm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas is nothing more than a Uncle Tom. He only cares about him self and no one else.
by
Johnsonj2
October 26, 2009, 10:54 am
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are a good man Clarence Thomas. May you live a long time and continue to serve this country well.
by
Pollypocket
October 26, 2009, 10:08 am
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a sad, pathetic man, EXCEPT, he doesn’t need pity, he NEEDS a bullet through his brain. He had no adversity to being himself appointed by Papa Bushit, to do the bidding of the far right, but now criticizes appointments being made to balance the court. Why would he ask questions? Regardless of the answers, that lap-dog knows he BETTER vote with Scalia & the rest of the KLAN!
by
Sevennotrump
October 26, 2009, 9:05 am
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------